Mat Performance Tables 2018

At the same time 56 per cent of mats have an ebacc entry rate below the national average.

Mat performance tables 2018.

Schools or colleges covering 16 18 study in this mat s performance data. Including the impact of a change to performance measures and a look at mat disadvantage figures. These statistics are based on measures of progress for mats with three or more academies that have been with the mat for at least three full academic years and have results in the 2019 school performance tables. More academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2018 school performance tables.

Multi academy trusts mats responsible for a group of academies. Around two thirds of mats had an ebacc point score lower than the national average. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort. Data on the performance of multi academy trusts mats.

They also score lower in terms of the government s new average point score for the ebacc which in 2018 was 3 78 among mats compared with 4 12 for all state funded schools. The dfe has published statistics on the performance at key stage 4 of state funded mainstream schools in multi academy trusts in england. Academy trust performance 2018 revised 24 january 2019 this publication shows revised gcse and equivalent statistics for key stage 4 ks4 in 2018. It updates the provisional statistics and provides breakdowns by pupil characteristics as well as ks4 performance measures at a multi academy trust mat level.

Launched in march 2016 the online school performance table tool allows users to search for any school in the country and view its test results ofsted reports and financial information. City of norwich school an ormiston academy. This statistical first release and mat level data in performance tables provides data and analysis on the performance of mats in england at key stage 2 ks2 and key stage 4 ks4 respectively. It is based on measures of progress for mats with 3 or more academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2017 school performance tables.

For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures applied general qualifications cohort.